Re: [patch 04/44] posix-cpu-timers: Fixup stale comment
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Tue Aug 20 2019 - 18:56:16 EST
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:43:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> No it can't do that throughout posix_cpu_timer_del() because exit_itimers()
> can only look at current->signal->posix_timers which does not contain the
> posix timers owned by a different task/process.
> We could of course invoke posix_cpu_timers_exit() from exit_itimers() but
> does that buy anything?
> > It would make things more simple to delete the timer off the target from
> > the same caller and place and we could remove posix_cpu_timers_exit*().
> We can't. The foreign owned cpu timers are not in cur->signal->posix_timers
> so how should we invoke posix_cpu_timer_del() on them. Only the owner task
> can. The only thing the exiting task can do is to remove the foreign timer
> from it's expiry list which has nothing to do with cur->signal->posix_timers.
That's exactly what I'm proposing. I think you're misunderstanding me.
I want the owner to handle all the list deletion work from the target.
Ok let's imagine a timer $ITIMER, owned by task $OWNER and whose target is task $TARGET.
So it's enqueued on $OWNER->signal->posix_timers and $TARGET->cputime_expires.
Two scenarios can happen:
1) $TARGET exits first and is released. So it calls posix_cpu_timers_exit()
which deletes $ITIMER from $TARGET->cputime_expires.
Later on, $OWNER exits and calls exit_itimers() -> timer_delete_hook($ITIMER)
-> posix_cpu_timer_del($ITIMER). It finds $TARGET as the target of $ITIMER but no
more sighand. So it returns.
2) $OWNER exits first and calls exit_itimer() -> timer_delete_hook($ITIMER)
-> posix_cpu_timer_del($ITIMER). It finds $TARGET as the target of $ITIMER and it
finds a sighand to lock. So it deletes $ITIMER from $TARGET->cputime_expires
So I propose to change the behaviour of case 1) so that $TARGET doesn't call
posix_cpu_timers_exit(). We instead wait for $OWNER to exit and call
exit_itimers() -> timer_delete_hook($ITIMER) -> posix_cpu_timer_del($ITIMER).
It is going to find $TARGET as the target of $ITIMER but no more sighand. Then
finally it removes $ITIMER from $TARGET->cputime_expires.
We basically do the same thing as in 2) but without locking sighand since it's NULL
on $TARGET at this time.
I hope I'm less confusing (if not confused).