Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: misc: atmel-ssc: LRCLK from TF/RF pin option

From: Michał Mirosław
Date: Wed Aug 28 2019 - 09:03:01 EST


On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:26:55PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > Add single-pin LRCLK source options for Atmel SSC module.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > v2: split from implementation patch
> >
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/atmel-ssc.txt | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/atmel-ssc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/atmel-ssc.txt
> > index f9fb412642fe..c98e96dbec3a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/atmel-ssc.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/atmel-ssc.txt
> > @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ Optional properties:
> > this parameter to choose where the clock from.
> > - By default the clock is from TK pin, if the clock from RK pin, this
> > property is needed.
> > + - atmel,lrclk-from-tf-pin: bool property.
> > + - atmel,lrclk-from-rf-pin: bool property.
> > + - SSC in slave mode gets LRCLK from RF for receive and TF for transmit
> > + data direction. This property makes both use single TF (or RF) pin
> > + as LRCLK. At most one can be present.
>
> A single property taking 1 of possible 2 values would prevent the error
> of more than 1 property present.

It still would need a validation check in the code, though: you
could put wrong value then. It seems more consistent with the
existing parameters to have two bool properties.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław