Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Add clang-tidy and static analyzer support to makefile

From: Kees Cook
Date: Thu Aug 29 2019 - 15:18:04 EST


[ Added kbuild and Masahiro to CC ... ]

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:10:46PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

These two lines should be at the end of your commit log. :)

> These patches add clang-tidy and the clang static-analyzer as make
> targets. The goal of these patches is to make static analysis tools
> usable and extendable by any developer or researcher who is familiar
> with basic c++.
>
> The current static analysis tools require intimate knowledge of the internal
> workings of the static analysis. Clang-tidy and the clang static analyzers
> expose an easy to use api and allow users unfamiliar with clang to
> write new checks with relative ease.
>
> ===Clang-tidy===
>
> Clang-tidy is an easily extendable 'linter' that runs on the AST.
> Clang-tidy checks are easy to write and understand. A check consists of
> two parts, a matcher and a checker. The matcher is created using a
> domain specific language that acts on the AST
> (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LibASTMatchersReference.html). When AST
> nodes are found by the matcher a callback is made to the checker. The
> checker can then execute additional checks and issue warnings.
>
> Here is an example clang-tidy check to report functions that have calls
> to local_irq_disable without calls to local_irq_enable and vice-versa.
> Functions flagged with __attribute((annotation("ignore_irq_balancing")))
> are ignored for analysis.
>
> The full patch can be found here (https://reviews.llvm.org/D65828)
>
> ```
> void IrqUnbalancedCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
> // finds calls to "arch_local_irq_disable" in a function body
> auto disable =
> forEachDescendant(
> callExpr(
> hasDeclaration(
> namedDecl(
> hasName("arch_local_irq_disable")))).bind("disable"));
>
> // finds calls to "arch_local_irq_enable" in a function body
> auto enable =
> forEachDescendant(
> callExpr(
> hasDeclaration(
> namedDecl(
> hasName("arch_local_irq_enable")))).bind("enable"));
>
> // Looks for function body that has the following property:
> // ((disable && !enable) || (enable && !disable))
> auto matcher = functionDecl(
> anyOf(allOf(disable, unless(enable)), allOf(enable, unless(disable))));
>
> Finder->addMatcher(matcher.bind("func"), this);
> }
>
> std::string annotation = "ignore_irq_balancing";
> void IrqUnbalancedCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
> const auto *MatchedDecl = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<FunctionDecl>("func");
> const auto *DisableCall = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("disable");
> const auto *EnableCall = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("enable");
>
> // If the function has __attribute((annotate("ignore_irq_balancing"))
> for (const auto *Attr : MatchedDecl->attrs()) {
> if (Attr->getKind() == clang::attr::Annotate) {
> if(dyn_cast<AnnotateAttr>(Attr)->getAnnotation().str() == annotation) {
> return;
> }
> }
> }
>
> if(EnableCall) {
> diag(MatchedDecl->getLocation(), "call to 'enable_local_irq' without 'disable_local_irq' in %0 ")
> << MatchedDecl;
> diag(EnableCall->getBeginLoc(), "call to 'enable_local_irq'", DiagnosticIDs::Note)
> << MatchedDecl;
> }
>
> if(DisableCall) {
> diag(MatchedDecl->getLocation(), "call to 'disable_local_irq' without 'enable_local_irq' in %0 ")
> << MatchedDecl;
> diag(DisableCall->getBeginLoc(), "call to 'disable_local_irq'", DiagnosticIDs::Note)
> << MatchedDecl;
> }
> }
> ```
>
> ===Clang static analyzer===
>
> The clang static analyzer is a more powerful static analysis tool that
> uses symbolic execution to find bugs. Currently there is a check that
> looks for potential security bugs from invalid uses of kmalloc and
> kfree. There are several more general purpose checks that are useful for
> the kernel.
>
> The clang static analyzer is well documented and designed to be
> extensible.
> (https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/checker_dev_manual.html)
> (https://github.com/haoNoQ/clang-analyzer-guide/releases/download/v0.1/clang-analyzer-guide-v0.1.pdf)
>
>
> Why add clang-tidy and the clang static analyzer when other static
> analyzers are already in the kernel?
>
> The main draw of the clang tools is how accessible they are. The clang
> documentation is very nice and these tools are built specifically to be
> easily extendable by any developer. They provide an accessible method of
> bug-finding and research to people who are not overly familiar with the
> kernel codebase.
>

^ i.e. they should be right here...

> Makefile | 3 ++
> scripts/clang-tools/Makefile.clang-tools | 35 ++++++++++++++
> .../{ => clang-tools}/gen_compile_commands.py | 0
> scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 scripts/clang-tools/Makefile.clang-tools
> rename scripts/{ => clang-tools}/gen_compile_commands.py (100%)
> create mode 100755 scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index fabc127d127f..49f1d3fa48a8 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -709,6 +709,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,--param=allow-store-data-races=0)
>
> include scripts/Makefile.kcov
> include scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins
> +include scripts/clang-tools/Makefile.clang-tools
>
> ifdef CONFIG_READABLE_ASM
> # Disable optimizations that make assembler listings hard to read.
> @@ -1470,6 +1471,8 @@ help:
> @echo ' headers_check - Sanity check on exported headers'
> @echo ' headerdep - Detect inclusion cycles in headers'
> @echo ' coccicheck - Check with Coccinelle'
> + @echo ' clang-analyzer - Check with clang static analyzer'
> + @echo ' clang-tidy - Check with clang-tidy'

I think this is great; more people will be able to run these tests.

> @echo ''
> @echo 'Kernel selftest:'
> @echo ' kselftest - Build and run kernel selftest (run as root)'
> diff --git a/scripts/clang-tools/Makefile.clang-tools b/scripts/clang-tools/Makefile.clang-tools
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0adb6df20777
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/clang-tools/Makefile.clang-tools
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +PHONY += clang-tidy
> +HAS_PARALLEL := $(shell (parallel --version 2> /dev/null) | grep 'GNU parallel' 2> /dev/null)
> +clang-tidy:
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> + $(PYTHON3) scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py
> +ifdef HAS_PARALLEL

Is it worth falling back to xargs? Are there builders where clang-tidy
or clang-analyzer are installed but parallel isn't? (i.e. it might just
be better to simply require parallel.) Note that there's no test for
python3 -- we just try to run it. :)

> + #Xargs interleaves multiprocessed output. GNU Parallel does not.
> + scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py compile_commands.json \
> + | parallel -k -j $(shell nproc) 'echo {} && clang-tidy -p . "-checks=-*,linuxkernel-*" {}'
> +else
> + @echo "GNU parallel is not installed. Defaulting to non-parallelized runs"
> + scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py compile_commands.json \
> + | xargs -L 1 -I@ sh -c "echo '@' && clang-tidy -p . '-checks=-*,linuxkernel-*' @"
> +endif
> +else
> + $(error Clang-tidy requires CC=clang)
> +endif
> +
> +PHONY += clang-analyzer
> +clang-analyzer:
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> + $(PYTHON3) scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py
> +ifdef HAS_PARALLEL
> + #Xargs interleaves multiprocessed output. GNU Parallel does not.
> + scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py compile_commands.json \
> + | parallel -k -j $(shell nproc) 'echo {} && clang-tidy -p . "-checks=-*,clang-analyzer-*" {}'
> +else
> + @echo "GNU parallel is not installed. Defaulting to non-parallelized runs"
> + scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py compile_commands.json \
> + | xargs -L 1 -I@ sh -c "echo '@' && clang-tidy -p . '-checks=-*,clang-analyzer-*' @"
> +endif
> +else
> + $(error Clang-analyzer requires CC=clang)
> +endif
> diff --git a/scripts/gen_compile_commands.py b/scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py
> similarity index 100%
> rename from scripts/gen_compile_commands.py
> rename to scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py
> diff --git a/scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py b/scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..d6bc1bf9951e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/clang-tools/parse_compile_commands.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/env python
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) Google LLC, 2019
> +#
> +# Author: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +#
> +"""A helper routine for make clang-tidy to parse compile_commands.json."""
> +
> +import argparse
> +import json
> +import logging
> +import os
> +import re
> +
> +def parse_arguments():
> + """Set up and parses command-line arguments.
> + Returns:
> + file_path: Path to compile_commands.json file
> + """
> + usage = """Parse a compilation database and return a list of files
> + included in the database"""
> + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=usage)
> +
> + file_path_help = ('Path to the compilation database to parse')
> + parser.add_argument('file', type=str, help=file_path_help)
> +
> + args = parser.parse_args()
> +
> + return args.file
> +
> +
> +def main():
> + filename = parse_arguments()
> +
> + #Read JSON data into the datastore variable
> + if filename:
> + with open(filename, 'r') as f:
> + datastore = json.load(f)
> +
> + #Use the new datastore datastructure
> + for entry in datastore:
> + print(entry['file'])
> +
> +
> +if __name__ == '__main__':
> + main()

And this is nice to have because now there is a real consumer of
gen_compile_commands.py.

--
Kees Cook