Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm64 tree
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Mon Sep 02 2019 - 05:08:52 EST
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:44:43AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Hi all,
> > Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
> > arch/Kconfig
> > between commit:
> > 5cf896fb6be3 ("arm64: Add support for relocating the kernel with RELR relocations")
> > from the arm64 tree and commit:
> > 0c9c1d563975 ("x86, s390: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT definition to arch/Kconfig")
> > from the powerpc tree.
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> That conflict seems entirely trivial, but Catalin/Will if it bothers you
> I have the conflicting commit in a topic branch based on rc2 which you
> could merge to resolve it:
It's a trivial conflict, easy to resolve. I don't think it's worth
trying to avoid it (Linus normally doesn't mind such conflicts).