Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/ttm: add drm_gem_ttm_print_info()
From: Gerd Hoffmann
Date: Tue Sep 03 2019 - 02:15:34 EST
> > + [ TTM_PL_SYSTEM ] = "system",
> > + [ TTM_PL_TT ] = "tt",
> > + [ TTM_PL_VRAM ] = "vram",
> > + [ TTM_PL_PRIV ] = "priv",
> > +
> This 'gap' in the array seems to be a problem for drivers that use these
> bits. Could the print logic be moved into s separate function that also
> takes the array as an argument?
Are there any drivers which actually use these bits and which therefore
might want to use a different array?
Also note they should not cause any problems (other than not being
printed). There is an explicit check here ...
> > + if (!plname[i])
> > + continue;
.. to skip unknown bits.