Re: [PATCH 3/5] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()
From: Jason Gunthorpe
Date: Tue Sep 03 2019 - 03:36:49 EST
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Cleanest would be a new header I guess, together with might_sleep().
> > But moving that is a bit much I think, there's almost 500 callers of
> > that one from a quick git grep
> > > If dropping do while is the only change then I can edit it in..
> > > I think we have the acks now
> > Yeah sounds simplest, thanks.
> Hi Jason,
> Do you expect me to resend now, or do you plan to do the patchwork
> appeasement when applying? I've seen you merged the other patches
> (thanks!), but not these two here.
Sorry, I didn't get to this before I started travelling, and deferred
it since we were having linux-next related problems with hmm.git. I
hope to do it today.
I will fix it up as promised