Re: [PATCH 01/11] mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate if SDIO IRQs is enabled
From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Wed Sep 04 2019 - 19:58:44 EST
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:21:57PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To avoid each host driver supporting SDIO IRQs, from keeping track
> internally about if SDIO IRQs has been enabled, let's introduce a common
> helper function, sdio_irq_enabled().
> The function returns true if SDIO IRQs are enabled, via using the
> information about the number of claimed irqs. This is safe, even without
> any locks, as long as the helper function is called only from
> runtime/system suspend callbacks of the host driver.
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> index 4a351cb7f20f..0c0a565c7ff1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> @@ -493,6 +493,15 @@ void mmc_command_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq);
> void mmc_cqe_request_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq);
> + * May be called from host driver's system/runtime suspend/resume callbacks,
> + * to know if SDIO IRQs has been enabled.
> +static inline bool sdio_irq_enabled(struct mmc_host *host)
> + return host->sdio_irqs > 0;
The name of the function is a bit misleadling, since it indicates
if SDIO IRQs should be enabled, not whether they are actually enabled
by the host. The resulting code can look a bit confusing to the
aka 'if SDIO IRQ is enabled, enable SDIO IRQ'.
sdio_irqs_claimed() could be a possible alternative.
No biggie though, just something I noticed.