Re: [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v12)

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
> 
>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
> 
> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
> still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.

Which work is this? Do you have a URL reference to WIP?

> (We have something that should work for us as long as we can get large
> machines from the lab, but I agree that it's not very useful if glibc
> bot-cycle time is roughly one business day.)

Yeah, we have to discuss how to accelerate this.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.