Re: [PATCH] bpf: validate bpf_func when BPF_JIT is enabled
From: Toke HÃiland-JÃrgensen
Date: Thu Sep 12 2019 - 06:52:05 EST
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:09 AM Toke HÃiland-JÃrgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> BjÃrn TÃpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > I ran the "xdp_rxq_info" sample with and without Sami's patch:
>> Thanks for doing this!
> Yes, thanks for testing this BjÃrn!
>> Or (1/22998700 - 1/23923874) * 10**9 == 1.7 nanoseconds of overhead.
>> I guess that is not *too* bad; but it's still chipping away at
>> performance; anything we could do to lower the overhead?
> The check is already rather minimal, but I could move this to a static
> inline function to help ensure the compiler doesn't generate an
> additional function call for this. I'm also fine with gating this
> behind a separate config option, but I'm not sure if that's worth it.
> Any thoughts?
I think it would be good if you do both. I'm a bit worried that XDP
performance will end up in a "death by a thousand paper cuts" situation,
so I'd rather push back on even relatively small overheads like this; so
being able to turn it off in the config would be good.
Can you share more details about what the "future CFI checking" is
likely to look like?