Re: [PATCH V2] gpio: mxc: Only getting second IRQ when there is more than one IRQ

From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Thu Sep 19 2019 - 10:16:51 EST


czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 11:40 Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx> napisaÅ(a):
>
> On some of i.MX SoCs like i.MX8QXP, there is ONLY one IRQ for each
> GPIO bank, so it is better to check the IRQ count before getting
> second IRQ to avoid below error message during probe:
>
> [ 1.070908] gpio-mxc 5d080000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.077420] gpio-mxc 5d090000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.083766] gpio-mxc 5d0a0000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.090122] gpio-mxc 5d0b0000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.096470] gpio-mxc 5d0c0000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.102804] gpio-mxc 5d0d0000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.109144] gpio-mxc 5d0e0000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
> [ 1.115475] gpio-mxc 5d0f0000.gpio: IRQ index 1 not found
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> - use local variable irq_count instead or err to avoid confusion.
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> index 7907a87..c77d474 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct mxc_gpio_port *port;
> + int irq_count;
> int irq_base;
> int err;
>
> @@ -426,9 +427,15 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(port->base))
> return PTR_ERR(port->base);
>
> - port->irq_high = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> - if (port->irq_high < 0)
> - port->irq_high = 0;
> + irq_count = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> + if (irq_count < 0)
> + return irq_count;
> +
> + if (irq_count > 1) {
> + port->irq_high = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + if (port->irq_high < 0)
> + port->irq_high = 0;
> + }
>
> port->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (port->irq < 0)
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Applied, thanks.

Bart