Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index()

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Dmitry,

(CC'ing Heikki as the original author of software nodes support)

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit

s/bit/but/

> works with arbitrary firmware node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On a side note, as I'm not very familiar with software nodes, I tried to
see how they are to be used, and it seems they are completely
undocumented :-( Heikki, is this something that could be fixed ?

> ---
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> index 61cc2354ef1b..d9c9c9ebad2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> @@ -284,8 +284,8 @@ static int tfp410_get_connector_properties(struct tfp410 *dvi)
>  	else
>  		dvi->connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DVID;
>  
> -	dvi->hpd = fwnode_get_named_gpiod(&connector_node->fwnode,
> -					"hpd-gpios", 0, GPIOD_IN, "hpd");
> +	dvi->hpd = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(&connector_node->fwnode,
> +					  "hpd", 0, GPIOD_IN, "hpd");
>  	if (IS_ERR(dvi->hpd)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dvi->hpd);
>  		dvi->hpd = NULL;

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart