Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform: goldfish: Allow goldfish virtual platform drivers for RISCV

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Sep 25 2019 - 01:09:21 EST


On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:30:00AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:13 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:30:03AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> > > We will be using some of the Goldfish virtual platform devices (such
> > > as RTC) on QEMU RISC-V virt machine so this patch enables goldfish
> > > kconfig option for RISC-V architecture.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig
> > > index 77b35df3a801..0ba825030ffe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/platform/goldfish/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > menuconfig GOLDFISH
> > > bool "Platform support for Goldfish virtual devices"
> > > - depends on X86_32 || X86_64 || ARM || ARM64 || MIPS
> > > + depends on X86_32 || X86_64 || ARM || ARM64 || MIPS || RISCV
> >
> > Why does this depend on any of these? Can't we just have:
>
> May be Goldfish drivers were compile tested/tried on these architectures only.

True, but that does not mean a driver should only have a specific list
of arches. This should only be needed if you _know_ it doesn't work on
a specific arch, not the other way around.

> > > depends on HAS_IOMEM
> >
> > And that's it?
>
> I think it should be just "depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA" just like
> VirtIO MMIO. Agree ??

No idea, but if that's what is needed for building, then sure :)

thanks,

greg k-h