RE: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes
From: Madalin-cristian Bucur
Date: Wed Oct 09 2019 - 01:54:09 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 7:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DPAA fixes
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:10:21 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > Here's a series of fixes and changes for the DPAA 1.x drivers.
> > Fixing some boot time dependency issues, removing some dead code,
> > changing the buffers used for reception, fixing the DMA devices,
> > some cleanups.
> Hi Madalin!
> The title of this series says "DPAA fixes", are these bug fixes?
> If so they should target the net tree ([PATCH net]) and contain
> appropriate Fixes tags.
> Cleanups should go into the net-next tree ([PATCH net-next]).
> Please try to not post more than 15 patches in one series, it clogs
> up the review flow.
> For some of those and other best practices please see:
> IMHO there is also no need at all to CC linux-kernel on networking
I should have added the net-next target in the subject.
I can split the (minor) fixes from the other changes.
I've added "Fixes" tags to the fix patches already.
In regards to the patch count, I can send two patch
sets but it won't reduce the total...