Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/alternatives,jump_label: Provide better text_poke() batching interface

From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
Date: Wed Oct 09 2019 - 08:04:12 EST

On 07/10/2019 10:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Adding another text_poke_bp_batch() user made me realize the interface
> is all sorts of wrong. The text poke vector should be internal to the
> implementation.
> This then results in a trivial interface:
> text_poke_queue() - which has the 'normal' text_poke_bp() interface
> text_poke_finish() - which takes no arguments and flushes any
> pending text_poke()s.
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- Daniel