Re: string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check

[Markus Elfring]

> I reviewed the functions here and believe the ones you added checks
> for all look good.

Thanks for your positive feedback.


> Though Joe's comment on the relative order of where the
> annotation appears in the function declarations should be addressed in
> a V2 IMO.

Would you be looking for a subsequent change also by the means of
the semantic patch language with which the (function) attributes
can be adjusted to the ordering that you would prefer finally?

Regards,
Markus