Re: [PATCH] rcu: add declarations of undeclared items

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Oct 14 2019 - 21:41:38 EST


On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 01:51:23PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:44:30PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:08:24PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > > The rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus and rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs
> > > do not have declarations in a header. Add these to remove the
> > > following sparse warnings:
> > >
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:87:18: warning: symbol 'rcu_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:191:15: warning: symbol 'rcu_rnp_online_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Good catch!
> >
> > However, these guys (plus one more) are actually used only in the
> > kernel/rcu/tree.o translation unit, so they can be marked static.
> > I made this change as shown below with your Reported-by.
> >
> > Seem reasonable?
> >
>
> LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thank you!

Thanx, Paul

> thanks,
>
> - Joel
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit 02995691aa76f3e52599d4f9d9d1ab23c3574f32
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri Oct 11 21:40:09 2019 -0700
> >
> > rcu: Mark non-global functions and variables as static
> >
> > Each of rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus(), rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(),
> > and rcu_dynticks_snap() are used only in the kernel/rcu/tree.o translation
> > unit, and may thus be marked static. This commit therefore makes this
> > change.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index b18fa3d..278798e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = {
> > .dynticks_nmi_nesting = DYNTICK_IRQ_NONIDLE,
> > .dynticks = ATOMIC_INIT(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR),
> > };
> > -struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
> > +static struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
> > .level = { &rcu_state.node[0] },
> > .gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE,
> > .gp_seq = (0UL - 300UL) << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT,
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_get_gp_kthreads_prio);
> > * held, but the bit corresponding to the current CPU will be stable
> > * in most contexts.
> > */
> > -unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> > +static unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> > {
> > return READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext);
> > }
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void)
> > *
> > * No ordering, as we are sampling CPU-local information.
> > */
> > -bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> > +static bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> > {
> > struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> >
> > @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> > * Snapshot the ->dynticks counter with full ordering so as to allow
> > * stable comparison of this counter with past and future snapshots.
> > */
> > -int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > +static int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > {
> > int snap = atomic_add_return(0, &rdp->dynticks);
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > index 1540542..f8e6c70 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > @@ -402,8 +402,6 @@ static const char *tp_rcu_varname __used __tracepoint_string = rcu_name;
> > #define RCU_NAME rcu_name
> > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING */
> >
> > -int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > -
> > /* Forward declarations for tree_plugin.h */
> > static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
> > static void rcu_qs(void);