Re: email as a bona fide git transport

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:54:09AM -0400, Santiago Torres Arias wrote:
> > Seeing how large this signature is, I have to admit that I am partial to
> > Konstantin's suggestion of using minisign. This seems like something
> > that could be added to git as an alternative to gpg without too much
> > trouble, I think.
>
> I wonder how big the pgp payload would be with ed25519 as the underlying
> algorithm. AFAICT, the payload of a minisign signature vs a signature
> packet have almost the same fields...

It's smaller, but it's not a one-liner. Here's a comparison using 
ED25519 keys of the same length:

minisign:

RWQ4kF9UdFgeSt3LqnS3WnrLlx2EnuIFW7euw5JnLUHY/79ipftmj7A2ug7FiR2WmnFNoSacWr7llBuyInVmRL/VRovj1LFtvA0=

pgp:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQR2vl2yUnHhSB5njDW2xBzjVmSZbAUCXaniFAAKCRC2xBzjVmSZ
bHA5AP46sSPFJfL2tbXwswvj0v2DjLAQ9doxl9bfj9iPZu+3qwEAw5qAMbjw9teL
L7+NbJ0WVniDWTgt+5ruQ2V9vyfYxAc=
=B/St
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-K