Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] dt-bindings: sram: Convert SRAM bindings to json-schema

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Oct 21 2019 - 09:25:45 EST


On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 02:12:40PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 06:43:07PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Convert generic mmio-sram bindings to DT schema format using
> > json-schema. Require the address/size cells to be 1, not equal to root
> > node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > 1. Add Rob as maintainer,
> > 2. Use "contains" for compatible,
> > 3. Fix address and size cells to 1,
> > 4. Add maxitems to reg under children,
> > 5. Remove unneeded string type from label.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > 1. Indent example with four spaces (more readable).
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.txt | 80 -----------
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 134 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
>
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a1c1ec2183f2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sram/sram.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Generic on-chip SRAM
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > + Simple IO memory regions to be managed by the genalloc API.
> > +
> > + Each child of the sram node specifies a region of reserved memory. Each
> > + child node should use a 'reg' property to specify a specific range of
> > + reserved memory.
> > +
> > + Following the generic-names recommended practice, node names should
> > + reflect the purpose of the node. Unit address (@<address>) should be
> > + appended to the name.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + $nodename:
> > + pattern: "^sram(@.*)?"
> > +
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + enum:
> > + - mmio-sram
> > + - atmel,sama5d2-securam
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + "#address-cells":
> > + const: 1
> > +
> > + "#size-cells":
> > + const: 1
> > +
> > + ranges:
> > + description:
> > + Should translate from local addresses within the sram to bus addresses.
> > +
> > + no-memory-wc:
> > + description:
> > + The flag indicating, that SRAM memory region has not to be remapped
> > + as write combining. WC is used by default.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^([a-z]*-)?sram@[a-f0-9]$":
> > + type: object
> > + description:
> > + Each child of the sram node specifies a region of reserved memory.
> > + properties:
> > + reg:
> > + description:
> > + IO mem address range, relative to the SRAM range.
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + compatible:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>
> No need to define the type again. We can say 'maxItems: 1' if we really
> want to force it to 1 entry.

I'll fix it and integrate Samsung compatibles here.

>
> > + description:
> > + Should contain a vendor specific string in the form
> > + <vendor>,[<device>-]<usage>
> > +
> > + pool:
> > + description:
> > + Indicates that the particular reserved SRAM area is addressable
> > + and in use by another device or devices.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + export:
> > + description:
> > + Indicates that the reserved SRAM area may be accessed outside
> > + of the kernel, e.g. by bootloader or userspace.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + protect-exec:
> > + description: |
> > + Same as 'pool' above but with the additional constraint that code
> > + will be run from the region and that the memory is maintained as
> > + read-only, executable during code execution. NOTE: This region must
> > + be page aligned on start and end in order to properly allow
> > + manipulation of the page attributes.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > + label:
> > + description:
> > + The name for the reserved partition, if omitted, the label is taken
> > + from the node name excluding the unit address.
> > +
> > + clocks:
>
> Shouldn't this be up one level? Looks like this is the only case
> (Marvell and i.MX are the only ones I see with clocks).

Yes, that's a mistake in original bindings.

>
> > + description:
> > + A list of phandle and clock specifier pair that controls the
> > + single SRAM clock.
>
> maxItems: 1

Yes.

>
> > +
> > + required:
> > + - reg
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - "#address-cells"
> > + - "#size-cells"
> > + - ranges
>
> Does 'additionalProperties' work here and/or in the child node? I guess
> not if we keep some node names.

It seems that it works.

>
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + sram: sram@5c000000 {
> > + compatible = "mmio-sram";
> > + reg = <0x5c000000 0x40000>; /* 256 KiB SRAM at address 0x5c000000 */
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges = <0 0x5c000000 0x40000>;
> > +
> > + smp-sram@100 {
> > + compatible = "socvendor,smp-sram";
> > + reg = <0x100 0x50>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + device-sram@1000 {
> > + reg = <0x1000 0x1000>;
> > + pool;
> > + };
> > +
> > + exported@20000 {
>
> This one doesn't match the pattern. That's fine I guess for dts files,
> but examples should be good examples.

Sure.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

>
> > + reg = <0x20000 0x20000>;
> > + export;
> > + };
> > + };
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >