Re: [PATCH 11/36] ARM: s5pv210: split from plat-samsung

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:51 AM Uwe Kleine-KÃnig
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:29:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > These can be build completely independently, so split
> > the two Kconfig symbols.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> I'd mention the two symbols' names you're working on in the commit log.
> I guess it's about PLAT_SAMSUNG and ARCH_S5PV210. And I wouldn't call it
> "split" which IMHO suggests there was only one symbol before.
>
> Maybe:
>
>         Don't imply PLAT_SAMSUNG if ARCH_S5PV210 is enabled
>
> would be a better subject line?

Ok, changed to

ARM: s5pv210: don't imply CONFIG_PLAT_SAMSUNG

> > @@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR)              += spear
> >  # by CONFIG_* macro name.
> >  plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP)     += omap
> >  plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S3C64XX)  += samsung
> > -plat-$(CONFIG_ARCH_S5PV210)  += samsung
>
> Would it make more sense to make this
>
>         plat-$(PLAT_SAMSUNG) += samsung
>
> (in a separate patch)? Hmm, it seems there is no plat-y for
> PLAT_S3C24XX=y builds. Is this intended? If yes, the directory name
> containing "samsung" suggests something that seems untrue.

By the end of the series, the plat-samsung directory is completely
removed (folded into mach-s3c), so that would only add more
churn for the same result I think.

     Arnd