Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

From: Leo Yan
Date: Wed Oct 23 2019 - 05:28:44 EST


On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
> > * breakpointed instruction.
> > *
> > * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step
> > - * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed
> > + * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed
> > * instruction.
> > *
> > * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
>
> Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was
> merged.

No worries and thanks for review.