Re: [Patch v2 1/2] lib/rbtree: set successor's parent unconditionally

From: Michel Lespinasse
Date: Mon Oct 28 2019 - 00:30:31 EST


Code looks fine, for both commits in this series. Please make sure to
double check that lib/rbtree_test does not show any performance
regressions, but assuming they don't, looks great !

Reviewed-By: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 7:15 PM Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Both in Case 2 and 3, we exchange n and s. This mean no matter whether
> child2 is NULL or not, successor's parent should be assigned to node's.
>
> This patch takes this step out to make it explicit and reduce the
> ambiguity.
>
> Besides, this step reduces some symbol size like rb_erase().
>
> KERN_CONFIG upstream patched
> OPT_FOR_PERF 877 870
> OPT_FOR_SIZE 635 621
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h b/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h
> index fdd421b8d9ae..99c42e1a74b8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h
> @@ -283,14 +283,13 @@ __rb_erase_augmented(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
> __rb_change_child(node, successor, tmp, root);
>
> if (child2) {
> - successor->__rb_parent_color = pc;
> rb_set_parent_color(child2, parent, RB_BLACK);
> rebalance = NULL;
> } else {
> unsigned long pc2 = successor->__rb_parent_color;
> - successor->__rb_parent_color = pc;
> rebalance = __rb_is_black(pc2) ? parent : NULL;
> }
> + successor->__rb_parent_color = pc;
> tmp = successor;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>


--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.