Re: [PATCH] Revert "sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in the load balancing path"

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:20:56PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:36, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:55:26AM -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> >
> > > I only know that the call to the intel_pstate driver doesn't
> > > happen, and that it is because cfs_rq_is_decayed returns TRUE.
> > > So, I am asserting that the request is not actually decayed, and
> > > should not have been deleted.
> >
> > So what cfs_rq_is_decayed() does is allow a cgroup's cfs_rq to be
> > removed from the list.
> >
> > Once it is removed, that cfs_rq will no longer be checked in the
> > update_blocked_averages() loop. Which means done has less chance of
> > getting false. Which in turn means that it's more likely
> > rq->has_blocked_load becomes 0.
> >
> > Which all sounds good.
> >
> > Can you please trace what keeps the CPU awake?
> 
> I think that the sequence below is what intel pstate driver was using
> 
> rt/dl task wakes up and run for some times
> rt/dl pelt signal is no more null so periodic decay happens.
> 
> before optimization update_cfs_rq_load_avg() for root cfs_rq was
> called even if pelt was null,
> which calls cfs_rq_util_change,  which calls intel pstate
> 
> after optimization its no more called.

Not calling cfs_rq_util_change() when it doesn't change, seems like the
right thing. Why would intel_pstate want it called when it doesn't
change?