Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and controller

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Wed Nov 06 2019 - 14:15:38 EST


On Wed 06 Nov 05:53 PST 2019, Georgi Djakov wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 2.11.19 ??. 2:31 ??., Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > Add the second PCIe controller and the associated QHP PHY found on
> > SDM845.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > index b93537b7a59f..0cdcc8d6d223 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > @@ -1468,6 +1468,117 @@
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + pcie1: pci@1c08000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,pcie-sdm845", "snps,dw-pcie";
> > + reg = <0 0x01c08000 0 0x2000>,
> > + <0 0x40000000 0 0xf1d>,
> > + <0 0x40000f20 0 0xa8>,
> > + <0 0x40100000 0 0x100000>;
> > + reg-names = "parf", "dbi", "elbi", "config";
> > + device_type = "pci";
> > + linux,pci-domain = <1>;
> > + bus-range = <0x00 0xff>;
> > + num-lanes = <1>;
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <3>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x40200000 0x0 0x40200000 0x0 0x100000>,
> > + <0x02000000 0x0 0x40300000 0x0 0x40300000 0x0 0x1fd00000>;
> > +
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 307 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + interrupt-names = "msi";
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0x7>;
> > + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 0 434 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_a */
> > + <0 0 0 2 &intc 0 435 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_b */
> > + <0 0 0 3 &intc 0 438 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_c */
> > + <0 0 0 4 &intc 0 439 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* int_d */
> > +
> > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_PIPE_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_MSTR_AXI_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_AXI_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_SLV_Q2A_AXI_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_CLKREF_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_NOC_PCIE_TBU_CLK>;
> > + clock-names = "pipe",
> > + "aux",
> > + "cfg",
> > + "bus_master",
> > + "bus_slave",
> > + "slave_q2a",
> > + "ref",
> > + "tbu";
> > +
> > + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_AUX_CLK>;
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <19200000>;
> > +
> > + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x1c00 0xf>;
> > + iommu-map = <0x0 &apps_smmu 0x1c00 0x1>,
> > + <0x100 &apps_smmu 0x1c01 0x1>,
> > + <0x200 &apps_smmu 0x1c02 0x1>,
> > + <0x300 &apps_smmu 0x1c03 0x1>,
> > + <0x400 &apps_smmu 0x1c04 0x1>,
> > + <0x500 &apps_smmu 0x1c05 0x1>,
> > + <0x600 &apps_smmu 0x1c06 0x1>,
> > + <0x700 &apps_smmu 0x1c07 0x1>,
> > + <0x800 &apps_smmu 0x1c08 0x1>,
> > + <0x900 &apps_smmu 0x1c09 0x1>,
> > + <0xa00 &apps_smmu 0x1c0a 0x1>,
> > + <0xb00 &apps_smmu 0x1c0b 0x1>,
> > + <0xc00 &apps_smmu 0x1c0c 0x1>,
> > + <0xd00 &apps_smmu 0x1c0d 0x1>,
> > + <0xe00 &apps_smmu 0x1c0e 0x1>,
> > + <0xf00 &apps_smmu 0x1c0f 0x1>;
> > +
> > + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_1_BCR>;
> > + reset-names = "pci";
> > +
> > + power-domains = <&gcc PCIE_1_GDSC>;
> > +
> > + interconnects = <&rsc_hlos MASTER_PCIE_0 &rsc_hlos SLAVE_EBI1>;
> > + interconnect-names = "pcie-mem";
>
> Maybe leave this hunk out (although it looks good), until we conclude on these
> refactoring patches [1].
>

Yes that makes sense and it's not necessary for it to be functional,
will drop it for now.

Regards,
Bjorn

> Thanks,
> Georgi
>
> [1]
> http://lore.kernel.org/r/1571278852-8023-1-git-send-email-daidavid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx