Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: iio: timer: Convert stm32 IIO trigger bindings to json-schema

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:52 PM Benjamin GAIGNARD
<benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/6/19 5:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:07:16AM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> >> Le dim. 3 nov. 2019 Ã 12:08, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> a Ãcrit :
> >>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:30:38 +0100
> >>> Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Convert the STM32 IIO trigger binding to DT schema format using json-schema
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx>
> >>> I'm far from great on these as still haven't taken the time I should to learn
> >>> the yaml syntax properly.  A few comments inline however based mostly on this
> >>> doesn't quite look like other ones I've seen recently.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Jonathan
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   .../bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>   .../bindings/iio/timer/stm32-timer-trigger.txt     | 25 ------------
> >>>>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml
> >>>>   delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/stm32-timer-trigger.txt
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 000000000000..1c8c8b55e8cd
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>>> +---
> >>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml#
> >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>> +
> >>>> +title: STMicroelectronics STM32 Timers IIO timer bindings
> >>>> +
> >>>> +maintainers:
> >>>> +  - Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxx>
> >>>> +  - Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxx>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +properties:
> >>>> +  $nodemane:
> >>> nodename?
> >> That will be in v2
> > No, $nodename is correct. The '$' signifies something we generate and
> > add in. IOW, not a real property. I guess we could have used 'name' here
> > and stuck with traditional OpenFirmware.
> let's go for $name

No, $nodename is correct. You don't have a choice. That is what the
tooling generates.

Rob