Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: fix rc5t619 ldo10 enable

[Andreas Kemnade]

Hi,

On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:32:11 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 07:26:43PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > LDO9 and LDO10 were listed with the same enable bits.
> > That looks insane and there are no provisions in the code for handling such
> > a special case. Also other out-of-tree drivers use a separate bit to
> > enable it.  
> 
> This definitely looks like a bug but without a datasheet or testing it's
> worrying guessing at the register bit to use for the enable for the
> second LDO...

I am hoping for a Tested-By: from the one who has submitted the patch
for the regulator. 

Well, it is not just guessing, it is there in the url I referenced. But
I would of course prefer a better source. At first I wanted to spread
my findings.
I am not pushing anyone to accept it without Tested-By/Reviewed-Bys.
What is a good way to avoid people bumping into this bug?
Maybe I can find the right C on the board to check.

Regards,
Andreas