Re: [FYI PATCH 0/7] Mitigation for CVE-2018-12207

[Jan Kiszka]

On 14.11.19 00:25, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 13/11/19 07:38, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > When reading MCE, error code 0150h, ie. SRAR, I was wondering if that
> > > couldn't simply be handled by the host. But I suppose the symptom of
> > > that erratum is not "just" regular recoverable MCE, rather
> > > sometimes/always an unrecoverable CPU state, despite the error code, right?
> >
> > The erratum documentation talks explicitly about hanging the system, but
> > it's not clear if it's just a result of the OS mishandling the MCE, or
> > something worse.  So I don't know. :(  Pawan, do you?
>
> As Dave mentioned in the other email its "something worse".
>
> Although this erratum results in a machine check with the same MCACOD
> signature as an SRAR error (0x150) the MCi_STATUS.PCC bit will be set to
> one. The Intel Software Developers manual says that PCC=1 errors are
> fatal and cannot be recovered.
>
> 	15.10.4.1 Machine-Check Exception Handler for Error Recovery [1]
>
> 	[...]
> 	The PCC flag in each IA32_MCi_STATUS register indicates whether recovery
> 	from the error is possible for uncorrected errors (UC=1). If the PCC
> 	flag is set for enabled uncorrected errors (UC=1 and EN=1), recovery is
> 	not possible.

And, as Dave observed, even that event is not delivered to software 
(maybe just logged by firmware for post-reset analysis) but can or does 
cause a machine lock-up, right?

Thanks,
Jan

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux