Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpuidle: teo: Avoid expecting unrealistic idle times

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Nov 14 2019 - 18:51:14 EST


On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:11 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> If an idle state shallower than the one "matching" the time till the
> next timer event is considered for selection, expect the idle duration
> to fall in the middle of the "bin" corresponding to that state rather
> than at the beginning of it which is unrealistic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> @@ -360,7 +360,14 @@ static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_dri
>
> if (max_early_idx >= 0) {
> idx = max_early_idx;
> - duration_ns = drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns;
> + /*
> + * Expect the idle duration to fall in the middle of the
> + * "bin" corresponding to idx (note that the maximum
> + * state index is guaranteed to be greater than idx at
> + * this point).
> + */
> + duration_ns = (drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns +
> + drv->states[idx+1].target_residency_ns) / 2;
> }
> }

This change turns out to cause the governor to choose idle states that
are too deep or too shallow too often, so I'm withdrawing it.

Thanks!