Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched/fair: Task placement biasing using uclamp

[Quentin Perret]

On Wednesday 20 Nov 2019 at 17:55:30 (+0000), Valentin Schneider wrote:
> While uclamp restrictions currently only impacts schedutil's frequency
> selection, it would make sense to also let it impact CPU selection in
> asymmetric topologies. This would let us steer specific tasks towards
> certain CPU capacities regardless of their actual utilization - I give a
> few examples in patch 3.
> 
> The first two patches are just paving the way for the meat of the thing
> which is in patch 3.

This makes sense, and is in line with what Qais proposed for RT I think.
So, with the nit applied to patch 3:

  Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
Quentin