[PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

[Kefeng Wang]

Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls.

Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc88fd939f4e..cfc923558e04 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 		if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) {
-			pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
-				   __func__, wq->name);
+			pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
+				__func__, wq->name);
 			show_pwq(pwq);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 			mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
-- 
2.20.1