Re: [PATCH] memblock: Use __func__ in remaining memblock_dbg() call sites

From: Mike Rapoport
Date: Mon Jan 06 2020 - 01:04:20 EST


On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:08:30AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Replace open function name strings with %s (__func__) in all remaining
> memblock_dbg() call sites.
>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index fc0d4db1d646..eba94ee3de0b 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_remove: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.memory, base, size);
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg(" memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> --
> 2.20.1
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.