Re: [PATCH 03/16] dt-bindings: atmel-tcb: add microchip,<chip>-tcb

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 10/01/2020 14:29:27+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10.01.2020 15:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> >> Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for
> >> microchip,sam9x60-tcb.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++--
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> >> index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >>  * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks
> >> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon".
> >> -  <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5"
> >> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb",
> >> +  "simple-mfd", "syscon".
> >> +  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"
> > 
> > atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb
> > are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that.
> 
> OK! I'll double check it.
> 
> > 
> > It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion
> > here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> I don't see this integrated in next-20200110. Am I looking at the wrong branch?
> 

I had a few comments and I need to resend.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com