Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: mss: q6v5-mss: Add modem support on SC7180

From: Sibi Sankar
Date: Tue Jan 14 2020 - 02:06:28 EST


Hey Evan,

Thanks for the review!
sry for the delayed response

On 2020-01-08 02:51, Evan Green wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:45 PM Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Add the out of reset sequence support for modem sub-system on SC7180
SoCs. It requires access to an additional halt nav register to put
the modem back into reset.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 198 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index 164fc2a53ef11..51f451311f5fc 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
#define AXI_HALTREQ_REG 0x0
#define AXI_HALTACK_REG 0x4
#define AXI_IDLE_REG 0x8
+#define NAV_AXI_HALTREQ_BIT BIT(0)
+#define NAV_AXI_HALTACK_BIT BIT(1)
+#define NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT BIT(2)

#define HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 100

@@ -101,9 +104,11 @@
#define QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL 0x20

/* QDSP6v65 parameters */
+#define QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR 0x20
#define QDSP6SS_SLEEP 0x3C
#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CORE_START 0x400
#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_CMD 0x404
+#define QDSP6SS_BOOT_STATUS 0x408
#define SLEEP_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS 200
#define BOOT_FSM_TIMEOUT 10000

@@ -131,6 +136,7 @@ struct rproc_hexagon_res {
int version;
bool need_mem_protection;
bool has_alt_reset;
+ bool has_halt_nav;
};

struct q6v5 {
@@ -141,9 +147,14 @@ struct q6v5 {
void __iomem *rmb_base;

struct regmap *halt_map;
+ struct regmap *halt_nav_map;
+ struct regmap *conn_map;
+
u32 halt_q6;
u32 halt_modem;
u32 halt_nc;
+ u32 halt_nav;
+ u32 conn_box;

struct reset_control *mss_restart;
struct reset_control *pdc_reset;
@@ -187,6 +198,7 @@ struct q6v5 {
struct qcom_sysmon *sysmon;
bool need_mem_protection;
bool has_alt_reset;
+ bool has_halt_nav;
int mpss_perm;
int mba_perm;
const char *hexagon_mdt_image;
@@ -198,6 +210,7 @@ enum {
MSS_MSM8974,
MSS_MSM8996,
MSS_MSM8998,
+ MSS_SC7180,
MSS_SDM845,
};

@@ -396,6 +409,18 @@ static int q6v5_reset_assert(struct q6v5 *qproc)
reset_control_assert(qproc->pdc_reset);
ret = reset_control_reset(qproc->mss_restart);
reset_control_deassert(qproc->pdc_reset);
+ } else if (qproc->has_halt_nav) {
+ /* SWAR using CONN_BOX_SPARE_0 for pipeline glitch issue */

Can you elaborate more in this comment, or remove it? Right now it
doesn't help me since I don't know what SWAR is, I don't see a

SWAR -> software work around

I'll have to stop with the dumb
abbreviations

reference to CONN_BOX_SPARE_0 in the code, I don't know what a

conn_box_spare_0 is at an offset
0xb3e4 in the conn_map which is
described in the bindings.

CONN_BOX is, and I don't know any details about the glitch issue :)

lol, yes I get that the comment does
not give details on the glitch. It
was targeted towards explaining why
there is a deviation in the reset_
assert sequence from the other SoCs.
If you still feel the comment does
not add any value I can get it
removed.


+ reset_control_assert(qproc->pdc_reset);
+ regmap_update_bits(qproc->conn_map, qproc->conn_box,
+ BIT(0), BIT(0));

Make a register name #define for this bit?

we'll have to make one up for it
since conn_box_spare_0 does not
have any predefined bits and seems
to be used to implement some missing
functionality.


+ regmap_update_bits(qproc->halt_nav_map, qproc->halt_nav,
+ NAV_AXI_HALTREQ_BIT, 0);
+ reset_control_assert(qproc->mss_restart);
+ reset_control_deassert(qproc->pdc_reset);
+ regmap_update_bits(qproc->conn_map, qproc->conn_box,
+ BIT(0), 0);
+ ret = reset_control_deassert(qproc->mss_restart);
} else {
ret = reset_control_assert(qproc->mss_restart);
}
@@ -413,6 +438,8 @@ static int q6v5_reset_deassert(struct q6v5 *qproc)
ret = reset_control_reset(qproc->mss_restart);
writel(0, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_ALT_RESET);
reset_control_deassert(qproc->pdc_reset);
+ } else if (qproc->has_halt_nav) {
+ ret = reset_control_reset(qproc->mss_restart);
} else {
ret = reset_control_deassert(qproc->mss_restart);
}
@@ -499,6 +526,54 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
return ret;
}

+ goto pbl_wait;

Ick, this could benefit from a refactor that pulls those sorta-common
steps "Remove IO clamp" through "Start core execution" into a helper
function and then calls the new function from each case that needs it.

+ } else if (qproc->version == MSS_SC7180) {
+ val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_SLEEP);
+ val |= 0x1;

It'd be nice if there were defines for these magic 0x1 values in this hunk too.

+ writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_SLEEP);
+
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_SLEEP,
+ val, !(val & BIT(31)), 1,
+ SLEEP_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "QDSP6SS Sleep clock timed out\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }

This toggling of the sleep bit is the same as sdm845, it could also be
put into a helper function.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11250301/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11250317/

I did club ^^ a portion of the out of
reset sequence together reducing
code duplication initially but that
made the entire thing unreadable.

The general consensus at that time
was to introduce a patch for sc7180
that is most readable and have a
cleanup later with a lot of helper
functions and less branching like
you suggested.


+
+ /* Turn on the XO clock needed for PLL setup */
+ val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
+ val |= 0x1;
+ writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
+
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR,
+ val, !(val & BIT(31)), 1,
+ SLEEP_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS);

Nit: SLEEP_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS isn't a loop count, it should really have
been named something like SLEEP_CHECK_TIMEOUT_US. Could be done in a
separate change.

I'll skip this for now. I'll
make sure that this gets named
appropriately during the
planned refactor.


+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "QDSP6SS XO clock timed out\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+
+ /* Configure Q6 core CBCR to auto-enable after reset sequence */
+ val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR);
+ val |= 0x1;
+ writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_CORE_CBCR);
+
+ /* De-assert the Q6 stop core signal */
+ writel(1, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_BOOT_CORE_START);
+
+ /* Trigger the boot FSM to start the Q6 out-of-reset sequence */
+ writel(1, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_BOOT_CMD);
+
+ /* Poll the QDSP6SS_BOOT_STATUS for FSM completion */
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_BOOT_STATUS,
+ val, (val & BIT(0)) != 0, 1,
+ SLEEP_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "Boot FSM failed to complete.\n");
+ /* Reset the modem so that boot FSM is in reset state */
+ q6v5_reset_deassert(qproc);
+ return ret;
+ }
goto pbl_wait;
} else if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998) {
@@ -667,6 +742,39 @@ static void q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(struct q6v5 *qproc,
regmap_write(halt_map, offset + AXI_HALTREQ_REG, 0);
}

+static void q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(struct q6v5 *qproc,
+ struct regmap *halt_map,
+ u32 offset)
+{
+ unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned int val;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Check if we're already idle */
+ ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
+ if (!ret && (val & NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT))
+ return;
+
+ /* Assert halt request */
+ regmap_update_bits(halt_map, offset, NAV_AXI_HALTREQ_BIT,
+ NAV_AXI_HALTREQ_BIT);
+
+ /* Wait for halt ack*/
+ timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS);
+ for (;;) {
+ ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
+ if (ret || (val & NAV_AXI_HALTACK_BIT) ||
+ time_after(jiffies, timeout))
+ break;
+
+ udelay(5);
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
+ if (ret || !(val & NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT))
+ dev_err(qproc->dev, "port failed halt\n");
+}
+
static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw)
{
unsigned long dma_attrs = DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS;
@@ -829,6 +937,9 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
halt_axi_ports:
q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
+ if (qproc->has_halt_nav)
+ q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_nav_map,
+ qproc->halt_nav);
q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);

reclaim_mba:
@@ -876,6 +987,9 @@ static void q6v5_mba_reclaim(struct q6v5 *qproc)

q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
+ if (qproc->has_halt_nav)
+ q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_nav_map,
+ qproc->halt_nav);
q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);
if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996) {
/*
@@ -1253,6 +1367,47 @@ static int q6v5_init_mem(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct platform_device *pdev)
qproc->halt_modem = args.args[1];
qproc->halt_nc = args.args[2];

+ if (qproc->has_halt_nav) {
+ struct platform_device *nav_pdev;
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "qcom,halt-nav-regs",
+ 1, 0, &args);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse halt-nav-regs\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ nav_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(args.np);
+ of_node_put(args.np);
+ if (!nav_pdev) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get mss clock device\n");
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ }
+
+ qproc->halt_nav_map = dev_get_regmap(&nav_pdev->dev, NULL);
+ if (!qproc->halt_nav_map) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get map from device\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ qproc->halt_nav = args.args[0];
+
+ ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "qcom,halt-nav-regs",
+ 1, 1, &args);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse halt-nav-regs\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ qproc->conn_map = syscon_node_to_regmap(args.np);
+ of_node_put(args.np);
+ if (IS_ERR(qproc->conn_map))
+ return PTR_ERR(qproc->conn_map);
+
+ qproc->conn_box = args.args[0];
+ }
+
return 0;
}

@@ -1327,7 +1482,7 @@ static int q6v5_init_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
return PTR_ERR(qproc->mss_restart);
}

- if (qproc->has_alt_reset) {
+ if (qproc->has_alt_reset || qproc->has_halt_nav) {
qproc->pdc_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qproc->dev,
"pdc_reset");
if (IS_ERR(qproc->pdc_reset)) {
@@ -1426,6 +1581,7 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

platform_set_drvdata(pdev, qproc);

+ qproc->has_halt_nav = desc->has_halt_nav;
ret = q6v5_init_mem(qproc, pdev);
if (ret)
goto free_rproc;
@@ -1549,6 +1705,41 @@ static int q6v5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}

+static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sc7180_mss = {
+ .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
+ .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "xo",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .reset_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "iface",
+ "bus",
+ "snoc_axi",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .active_clk_names = (char*[]){
+ "mnoc_axi",
+ "nav",
+ "mss_nav",
+ "mss_crypto",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .active_pd_names = (char*[]){
+ "load_state",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]){
+ "cx",
+ "mx",
+ "mss",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .need_mem_protection = true,
+ .has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_halt_nav = true,
+ .version = MSS_SC7180,
+};
+
static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss = {
.hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
.proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
@@ -1580,6 +1771,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm845_mss = {
},
.need_mem_protection = true,
.has_alt_reset = true,
+ .has_halt_nav = false,
.version = MSS_SDM845,
};

@@ -1606,6 +1798,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8998_mss = {
},
.need_mem_protection = true,
.has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_halt_nav = false,
.version = MSS_MSM8998,
};

@@ -1635,6 +1828,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8996_mss = {
},
.need_mem_protection = true,
.has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_halt_nav = false,
.version = MSS_MSM8996,
};

@@ -1667,6 +1861,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8916_mss = {
},
.need_mem_protection = false,
.has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_halt_nav = false,
.version = MSS_MSM8916,
};

@@ -1707,6 +1902,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8974_mss = {
},
.need_mem_protection = false,
.has_alt_reset = false,
+ .has_halt_nav = false,
.version = MSS_MSM8974,
};

@@ -1716,6 +1912,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id q6v5_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-mss-pil", .data = &msm8974_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-mss-pil", .data = &msm8996_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil", .data = &msm8998_mss},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mss-pil", .data = &sc7180_mss},
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mss-pil", .data = &sdm845_mss},
{ },
};
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.