Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: sun4i: hdmi: Add support for sun4i HDMI encoder audio

From: Stefan Mavrodiev
Date: Wed Jan 15 2020 - 07:23:41 EST


Hi,

On 1/15/20 10:32 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Stefan,

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:04:55AM +0200, Stefan Mavrodiev wrote:
On 1/10/20 6:26 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 04:11:40PM +0200, Stefan Mavrodiev wrote:
Add HDMI audio support for the sun4i-hdmi encoder, used on
the older Allwinner chips - A10, A20, A31.

Most of the code is based on the BSP implementation. In it
dditional formats are supported (S20_3LE and S24_LE), however
there where some problems with them and only S16_LE is left.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Mavrodiev <stefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi.h | 30 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_audio.c | 375 +++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c | 4 +
5 files changed, 411 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_audio.c

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig
index 37e90e42943f..192b732b10cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Kconfig
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ if DRM_SUN4I
config DRM_SUN4I_HDMI
tristate "Allwinner A10 HDMI Controller Support"
default DRM_SUN4I
+ select SND_PCM_ELD
help
Choose this option if you have an Allwinner SoC with an HDMI
controller.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile
index 0d04f2447b01..e2d82b451c36 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ sun4i-frontend-y += sun4i_frontend.o
sun4i-drm-y += sun4i_drv.o
sun4i-drm-y += sun4i_framebuffer.o

+sun4i-drm-hdmi-y += sun4i_hdmi_audio.o
sun4i-drm-hdmi-y += sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.o
sun4i-drm-hdmi-y += sun4i_hdmi_enc.o
sun4i-drm-hdmi-y += sun4i_hdmi_i2c.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi.h
index 7ad3f06c127e..456964e681b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi.h
@@ -42,7 +42,32 @@
#define SUN4I_HDMI_VID_TIMING_POL_VSYNC BIT(1)
#define SUN4I_HDMI_VID_TIMING_POL_HSYNC BIT(0)

+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_CTRL_REG 0x040
+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_CTRL_ENABLE BIT(31)
+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_CTRL_RESET BIT(30)
+
+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_FMT_REG 0x048
+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_FMT_SRC BIT(31)
+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_FMT_LAYOUT BIT(3)
+#define SUN4I_HDMI_AUDIO_FMT_CH_CFG(n) (n - 1)
There's the issue multiple times in the headers, but you should wrap n
in parentheses to make sure we have no issue with precedence when
calling the macro.

+int sun4i_hdmi_audio_create(struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_card *card = &sun4i_hdmi_audio_card;
+ struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *comp;
+ struct snd_soc_dai_link *link;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = devm_snd_dmaengine_pcm_register(hdmi->dev,
+ &sun4i_hdmi_audio_pcm_config, 0);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Could not register PCM\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(hdmi->dev,
+ &sun4i_hdmi_audio_component,
+ &sun4i_hdmi_audio_dai, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Could not register DAI\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ link = devm_kzalloc(hdmi->dev, sizeof(*link), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!link)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ comp = devm_kzalloc(hdmi->dev, sizeof(*comp) * 3, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!comp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ link->cpus = &comp[0];
+ link->codecs = &comp[1];
+ link->platforms = &comp[2];
+
+ link->num_cpus = 1;
+ link->num_codecs = 1;
+ link->num_platforms = 1;
+
+ link->playback_only = 1;
+
+ link->name = "SUN4I-HDMI";
+ link->stream_name = "SUN4I-HDMI PCM";
+
+ link->codecs->name = dev_name(hdmi->dev);
+ link->codecs->dai_name = sun4i_hdmi_audio_dai.name;
+
+ link->cpus->dai_name = dev_name(hdmi->dev);
+
+ link->platforms->name = dev_name(hdmi->dev);
+
+ link->dai_fmt = SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S;
+
+ card->dai_link = link;
+ card->num_links = 1;
+ card->dev = hdmi->dev;
+
+ snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(card, hdmi);
+ return devm_snd_soc_register_card(hdmi->dev, card);
Out of curiosity, did you try to remove the module with that patch
applied? IIRC, these functions will overwrite the device drvdata, and
we will try to access them in unbind / remove.
Actually I did not. Just tried that and you're right. The module
crashes at the unbind call. I use sun4i_hdmi struct only for
regmap. Maybe create separate private structure and copy only
regmap?
I think the issue is that:

- In bind, we first call dev_set_drvdata on the bound device, with a
pointer to struct sun4i_hdmi as the value. The driver_data field
in struct device is now a pointer to our instance of struct
sun4i_hdmi.

- In audio create, you then call snd_soc_card_set_drvdata with a
pointer to struct sun4i_hdmi as the value. The drvdata field in
the struct snd_soc_card is now a pointer to our instance of struct
sun4i_hdmi (so far so good).

- Then you call (devm_)snd_soc_register_card. One of the thing that
it will do is call drv_set_drvdata on the card->dev device,
setting it to our pointer to the struct snd_soc_card we provided.
However, since you set card->dev to the same device than the one
initially bound, this means that you just overwrote the struct
sun4i_hdmi pointer with a pointer to struct snd_soc_card.

- The driver will operate properly, since we never really use the
driver_data field, in the HDMI driver, except when...

- At unbind, you retrieve the driver_data field, expecting a struct
sun4i_hdmi pointer, except you have a pointer to struct
snd_soc_card, and everything explodes.

I think the way to work around that would be to create a new
(platform_)device for the HDMI audio component, so that ASoC can work
on that device instead.

This seems to be what dw-hdmi is doing here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c#L2812

(Except that they are also using platform_data, since they have
multiple drivers, we wouldn't, so we can just lookup sun4i_hdmi using
the parent's device driver_data).

+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c
index a7c4654445c7..79ecd89fb705 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ static void sun4i_hdmi_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
val |= SUN4I_HDMI_VID_CTRL_HDMI_MODE;

writel(val, hdmi->base + SUN4I_HDMI_VID_CTRL_REG);
+
+ if (hdmi->hdmi_audio && sun4i_hdmi_audio_create(hdmi))
+ DRM_ERROR("Couldn't create the HDMI audio adapter\n");
So you create the audio card each time the display is enabled? I guess
this is to deal with the hotplug?
Yes. See below.

I'm not sure this is the right thing to do. If I remember well, the
ELD are here precisely to let userspace know that the display is
plugged (and audio-capable) or not.

Also, you don't remove that card in the disable, which mean that if
you end up in a situation where you would enable the display, disable
it and then enable it again, you have two audio cards now.
There is issue with the hotplug. When inserting the cable, the event
is detected and the hdmi encoder is enabled. Thus the card is
created. However further removal and insertions are not
detected.
I guess we would need to fix that then?

This is why I don't remove the card.

Also I count on devm_snd_soc_register_card() to release the card.
I think you should really create the card all the time, and just
update the ELD to let the userspace know when something has been
created.

And yeah, we should have a working hotplug, but that's a separate
story :)

Thank you for the review. Soon I'll prepare v2.

Also I'll check the hotplug issue.


Maxime

Best regards,
Stefan