Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt

[Shiping Ji]

On 1/16/2020 3:39 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 06:32:27AM -0800, Shiping Ji wrote:
>> This is the device tree bindings for new EDAC driver dmc520_edac.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Lei Wang <leiwang_git@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> 
> So for this patch, v2 had Rui Zhao as an author:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/BN7PR08MB5572B3388B2D7DC8F6C7F285AE4C0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> v3 got Lei as an author:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CY1PR0401MB1244062C1738B09D6100F202860A0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> and now it is you.
> 
> So when you send next time, think about who's going to be the author.

I'll make sure Lei is the author (From:) in the next patches.

>> +     line numbers. The valid interrupt names are the followings:
> 
> WARNING: 'followings' may be misspelled - perhaps 'following'?
> #51: FILE: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/arm-dmc520.txt:10:
> +     line numbers. The valid interrupt names are the followings:

Yes, I think this can be fixed. I checked the scripts/spelling.txt and it does suggest using 'following' instead.
 
> Please integrate scripts/checkpatch.pl into your patch creation
> workflow. Some of the warnings/errors *actually* make sense.

Yes, we will.

> Also, this patch throws this other checkpatch warning:
> 
> WARNING: DT bindings should be in DT schema format. See: Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst
> 
> but since Rob reviewed it, I'm going to assume checkpatch is wrong here.
> 
> Thx.
 
The check seems to warn the next file in .txt format which should be rather in the new .yaml format. We'll try to make one next.

Thanks!

-- 
Best regards,
Shiping Ji