Re: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!

[Cong Wang]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:09 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, I fully agree with this.
> If we calculate the subclass for lock_nested() very well, I think we
> might use static lockdep key for addr_list_lock_key too. I think
> "dev->upper_level" and "dev->lower_level" might be used as subclass.
> These values are updated recursively in master/nomaster operation.

Great! I will think about this too. At least I will remove the other keys
for net-next.

Thanks.