Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] perf util: Move block_pair_cmp to block-info

From: Jin, Yao
Date: Fri Jan 31 2020 - 06:52:39 EST




On 1/31/2020 4:32 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 08:55:53PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
block_pair_cmp() is a function which is used to compare
two blocks. Moving it from builtin-diff.c to block-info.c
to let it can be used by other builtins.

v4/v5:
------
No change.

v3:
---
Separate it from original patch for good tracking.

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 17 -----------------
tools/perf/util/block-info.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/block-info.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
index f8b6ae557d8b..5ff1e21082cb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -572,23 +572,6 @@ static void init_block_hist(struct block_hist *bh)
bh->valid = true;
}
-static int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)
-{
- struct block_info *bi_a = a->block_info;
- struct block_info *bi_b = b->block_info;
- int cmp;
-
- if (!bi_a->sym || !bi_b->sym)
- return -1;
-
- cmp = strcmp(bi_a->sym->name, bi_b->sym->name);
-
- if ((!cmp) && (bi_a->start == bi_b->start) && (bi_a->end == bi_b->end))
- return 0;
-
- return -1;
-}
-
static struct hist_entry *get_block_pair(struct hist_entry *he,
struct hists *hists_pair)
{
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
index c4b030bf6ec2..f0f38bdd496a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
@@ -475,3 +475,20 @@ float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he)
return 0.0;
}
+
+int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b)

First thing that came to mind was that hist_entry comparision functions
had been changed to return int64_t recently, when I went to look at it I
found this:

tools/perf/util/block-info.c

int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
{
struct block_info *bi_l = left->block_info;
struct block_info *bi_r = right->block_info;
int cmp;
.
.
.

Which look a bit more complete, can you check if that can be used
instead or explain why my quick analysis of this is b0rken?

Perhaps we can have a __block_info__cmp() that doesn't receive the
perf_hpp_fmt (that isn't even used above) so that the previous use of
block_pair_cmp() can be replaced with __block_info__cmp() instead?

Thanks,

- Arnaldo


Hi Arnaldo,

I think it's a good idea to use __block_info__cmp() to replace the block_pair_cmp(). The block_info__cmp() is more comprehensive than block_pair_cmp() and we only need a bit change such as,

--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,

if (!bi_l->sym || !bi_r->sym) {
if (!bi_l->sym && !bi_r->sym)
- return 0;
+ return -1;
else if (!bi_l->sym)
return -1;
else

It returns -1 if both syms are NULL.

I will update the patchset.

Thanks
Jin Yao

+{
+ struct block_info *bi_a = a->block_info;
+ struct block_info *bi_b = b->block_info;
+ int cmp;
+
+ if (!bi_a->sym || !bi_b->sym)
+ return -1;
+
+ cmp = strcmp(bi_a->sym->name, bi_b->sym->name);
+
+ if ((!cmp) && (bi_a->start == bi_b->start) && (bi_a->end == bi_b->end))
+ return 0;
+
+ return -1;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.h b/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
index bef0d75e9819..4fa91eeae92e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.h
@@ -76,4 +76,6 @@ int report__browse_block_hists(struct block_hist *bh, float min_percent,
float block_info__total_cycles_percent(struct hist_entry *he);
+int block_pair_cmp(struct hist_entry *a, struct hist_entry *b);
+
#endif /* __PERF_BLOCK_H */
--
2.17.1