Re: [PATCH] modpost: return error if module is missing ns imports and MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS=n
From: Matthias Maennich
Date:  Mon Feb 17 2020 - 09:56:51 EST
Hi Jessica!
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:37:09PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Currently when CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS=n, modpost only warns
when a module is missing namespace imports. Under this configuration, such a module
cannot be loaded into the kernel anyway, as the module loader would reject it.
We might as well return a build error when a module is missing namespace imports
under CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS=n, so that the build
warning does not go ignored/unnoticed.
I generally agree with the idea of the patch. Thanks for working on
this! I also can't remember any reason why I did not write it like this
initially. Probably just because I introduced this configuration option
quite late in the development process of the initial patches.
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/Makefile.modpost |  1 +
scripts/mod/modpost.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modpost b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
index b4d3f2d122ac..a53660f910a9 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.modpost
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ MODPOST = scripts/mod/modpost						\
	$(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),$(addprefix -e ,$(KBUILD_EXTRA_SYMBOLS)))	\
	$(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),-o $(modulesymfile))			\
	$(if $(CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY),,-E)			\
+	$(if $(CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS),,-N) 	\
	$(if $(KBUILD_MODPOST_WARN),-w)
ifdef MODPOST_VMLINUX
diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
index 7edfdb2f4497..53e966f7d557 100644
--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
+++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ static int sec_mismatch_count = 0;
static int sec_mismatch_fatal = 0;
/* ignore missing files */
static int ignore_missing_files;
+/* Return an error when there are missing namespace imports */
+static int missing_ns_import_error = 0;
A more suitable name is maybe missing_ns_import_is_error or follow the
naming of the config option: allow_missing_ns_imports (with default = 1).
enum export {
	export_plain,      export_unused,     export_gpl,
@@ -2216,9 +2218,15 @@ static int check_exports(struct module *mod)
		if (exp->namespace &&
		    !module_imports_namespace(mod, exp->namespace)) {
-			warn("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
-			     basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
-			add_namespace(&mod->missing_namespaces, exp->namespace);
+			if (missing_ns_import_error) {
+				merror("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
+					basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
I would like to avoid the code duplication here. The string literal is
identical for both cases.
+				err = 1;
Also, if we fail here, we might as well help the user to fix it by
suggesting to run `make nsdeps` (once per failed modpost run). Speaking
of which, `make nsdeps` is currently broken by this patch as it relies
on a successful (yet warning-full) build of the modules. So, in case of
`make nsdeps`, we probably have to omit the -N flag again when invoking
modpost.
Cheers,
Matthias
+			} else {
+				warn("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
+				     basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
+			}
+				add_namespace(&mod->missing_namespaces, exp->namespace);
		}
		if (!mod->gpl_compatible)
@@ -2560,7 +2568,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
	struct ext_sym_list *extsym_iter;
	struct ext_sym_list *extsym_start = NULL;
-	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "i:e:mnsT:o:awEd:")) != -1) {
+	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "i:e:mnsT:o:awENd:")) != -1) {
		switch (opt) {
		case 'i':
			kernel_read = optarg;
@@ -2598,6 +2606,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
		case 'E':
			sec_mismatch_fatal = 1;
			break;
+		case 'N':
+			missing_ns_import_error = 1;
+			break;
		case 'd':
			missing_namespace_deps = optarg;
			break;
--
2.16.4