[PATCH] staging: bcm2835-camera: call function instead of macro

From: Kaaira Gupta
Date: Tue Feb 18 2020 - 14:18:05 EST


On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 09:37:11PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 09:37:28PM +0530, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
> > Fix checkpatch.pl warning of 'macro argument reuse' in bcm2835-camera.h
> > by removing the macro and calling the function, written in macro in
> > bcm2835-camera.h, directly in bcm2835-camera.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c | 28 +++++++++++++++----
> > .../bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.h | 10 -------
> > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c
> > index 1ef31a984741..19b3ba80d0e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c
> > @@ -919,9 +919,17 @@ static int vidioc_g_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *priv,
> > else
> > f->fmt.pix.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SMPTE170M;
> > f->fmt.pix.priv = 0;
> > -
> > - v4l2_dump_pix_format(1, bcm2835_v4l2_debug, &dev->v4l2_dev, &f->fmt.pix,
> > - __func__);
> > + v4l2_dbg(1, bcm2835_v4l2_debug, &dev->v4l2_dev,
> > + "%s: w %u h %u field %u pfmt 0x%x bpl %u sz_img %u colorspace 0x%x priv %u\n",
> > + __func__,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->width,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->height,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->field,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->pixelformat,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->bytesperline,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->sizeimage,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->colorspace,
> > + (&f->fmt.pix)->priv);
>
> This is not as nice to look at as the original. Just ignore the
> warning.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
So, is this warning to be ignored from everywhere in every driver, as it
doesn't look good? And if yes, then why is it there in the first place?

Thanks!