Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/ttm, drm/vmwgfx: Support huge TTM pagefaults

From: Thomas Hellstrom
Date: Sun Mar 01 2020 - 09:04:23 EST


On Sun, 2020-03-01 at 21:49 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:27:15 +0100 Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> > +
> > +static vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_huge_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf,
> > + enum page_entry_size pe_size)
> > +{
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> > + pgprot_t prot;
> > + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = vma->vm_private_data;
> > + vm_fault_t ret;
> > + pgoff_t fault_page_size = 0;
> > + bool write = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> > +
> > + switch (pe_size) {
> > + case PE_SIZE_PMD:
> > + fault_page_size = HPAGE_PMD_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + break;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD
> > + case PE_SIZE_PUD:
> > + fault_page_size = HPAGE_PUD_SIZE >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + break;
> > +#endif
> > + default:
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Fallback on write dirty-tracking or COW */
> > + if (write && ttm_pgprot_is_wrprotecting(vma->vm_page_prot))
> > + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> > +
> > + ret = ttm_bo_vm_reserve(bo, vmf);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + prot = vm_get_page_prot(vma->vm_flags);
> > + ret = ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(vmf, prot, 1, fault_page_size);
> > + if (ret == VM_FAULT_RETRY && !(vmf->flags &
> > FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT))
> > + return ret;
>
> Seems it does not make much sense to check VM_FAULT_RETRY and return
> as
> at least resv lock is left behind without care.

With this particular flag combination, both the mm_sem and the dma_resv
lock have already been released by TTM.

It's a special case allowing for drivers to release the mmap_sem when
waiting for IO.

That should probably be documented better in TTM.

/Thomas