[PATCH RT 1/8] userfaultfd: Use a seqlock instead of seqcount

From: zanussi
Date: Mon Mar 09 2020 - 15:48:42 EST


From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

v4.14.172-rt78-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

-----------


[ Upstream commit dc952a564d02997330654be9628bbe97ba2a05d3 ]

On RT write_seqcount_begin() disables preemption which leads to warning
in add_wait_queue() while the spinlock_t is acquired.
The waitqueue can't be converted to swait_queue because
userfaultfd_wake_function() is used as a custom wake function.

Use seqlock instead seqcount to avoid the preempt_disable() section
during add_wait_queue().

Cc: stable-rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index e2b2196fd9428..71886a8e8f71b 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct userfaultfd_ctx {
/* waitqueue head for events */
wait_queue_head_t event_wqh;
/* a refile sequence protected by fault_pending_wqh lock */
- struct seqcount refile_seq;
+ seqlock_t refile_seq;
/* pseudo fd refcounting */
atomic_t refcount;
/* userfaultfd syscall flags */
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
* waitqueue could become empty if this is the
* only userfault.
*/
- write_seqcount_begin(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ write_seqlock(&ctx->refile_seq);

/*
* The fault_pending_wqh.lock prevents the uwq
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
__add_wait_queue(&ctx->fault_wqh, &uwq->wq);

- write_seqcount_end(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ write_sequnlock(&ctx->refile_seq);

/* careful to always initialize msg if ret == 0 */
*msg = uwq->msg;
@@ -1246,11 +1246,11 @@ static __always_inline void wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
* sure we've userfaults to wake.
*/
do {
- seq = read_seqcount_begin(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ seq = read_seqbegin(&ctx->refile_seq);
need_wakeup = waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh) ||
waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_wqh);
cond_resched();
- } while (read_seqcount_retry(&ctx->refile_seq, seq));
+ } while (read_seqretry(&ctx->refile_seq, seq));
if (need_wakeup)
__wake_userfault(ctx, range);
}
@@ -1915,7 +1915,7 @@ static void init_once_userfaultfd_ctx(void *mem)
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->fault_wqh);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->event_wqh);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->fd_wqh);
- seqcount_init(&ctx->refile_seq);
+ seqlock_init(&ctx->refile_seq);
}

/**
--
2.14.1