[RFC][PATCH v4 28/69] pick_link(): check for WALK_TRAILING, not LOOKUP_PARENT

From: Al Viro
Date: Fri Mar 13 2020 - 19:57:05 EST


From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/namei.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 5d25a3874a5b..ff028f12cb95 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1723,8 +1723,10 @@ static inline int handle_dots(struct nameidata *nd, int type)
return 0;
}

+enum {WALK_TRAILING = 1, WALK_MORE = 2, WALK_NOFOLLOW = 4};
+
static const char *pick_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link,
- struct inode *inode, unsigned seq)
+ struct inode *inode, unsigned seq, int flags)
{
struct saved *last;
const char *res;
@@ -1762,7 +1764,7 @@ static const char *pick_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link,
clear_delayed_call(&last->done);
last->seq = seq;

- if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_PARENT)) {
+ if (flags & WALK_TRAILING) {
error = may_follow_link(nd, inode);
if (unlikely(error))
return ERR_PTR(error);
@@ -1819,8 +1821,6 @@ static const char *pick_link(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *link,
return NULL;
}

-enum {WALK_TRAILING = 1, WALK_MORE = 2, WALK_NOFOLLOW = 4};
-
/*
* Do we need to follow links? We _really_ want to be able
* to do this check without having to look at inode->i_op,
@@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ static const char *step_into(struct nameidata *nd, int flags,
if (read_seqcount_retry(&path.dentry->d_seq, seq))
return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);
}
- return pick_link(nd, &path, inode, seq);
+ return pick_link(nd, &path, inode, seq, flags);
}

static const char *walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int flags)
--
2.11.0