[PATCH 5.4 033/123] cgroup: memcg: net: do not associate sock with unrelated cgroup

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Mar 17 2020 - 07:03:14 EST


From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e876ecc67db80dfdb8e237f71e5b43bb88ae549c ]

We are testing network memory accounting in our setup and noticed
inconsistent network memory usage and often unrelated cgroups network
usage correlates with testing workload. On further inspection, it
seems like mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() and cgroup_sk_alloc() are broken in
irq context specially for cgroup v1.

mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() and cgroup_sk_alloc() can be called in irq context
and kind of assumes that this can only happen from sk_clone_lock()
and the source sock object has already associated cgroup. However in
cgroup v1, where network memory accounting is opt-in, the source sock
can be unassociated with any cgroup and the new cloned sock can get
associated with unrelated interrupted cgroup.

Cgroup v2 can also suffer if the source sock object was created by
process in the root cgroup or if sk_alloc() is called in irq context.
The fix is to just do nothing in interrupt.

WARNING: Please note that about half of the TCP sockets are allocated
from the IRQ context, so, memory used by such sockets will not be
accouted by the memcg.

The stack trace of mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() from IRQ-context:

CPU: 70 PID: 12720 Comm: ssh Tainted: 5.6.0-smp-DEV #1
Hardware name: ...
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack+0x57/0x75
mem_cgroup_sk_alloc+0xe9/0xf0
sk_clone_lock+0x2a7/0x420
inet_csk_clone_lock+0x1b/0x110
tcp_create_openreq_child+0x23/0x3b0
tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x88/0x730
tcp_check_req+0x429/0x560
tcp_v6_rcv+0x72d/0xa40
ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xc9/0x400
ip6_input+0x44/0xd0
? ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x400/0x400
ip6_rcv_finish+0x71/0x80
ipv6_rcv+0x5b/0xe0
? ip6_sublist_rcv+0x2e0/0x2e0
process_backlog+0x108/0x1e0
net_rx_action+0x26b/0x460
__do_softirq+0x104/0x2a6
do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
</IRQ>
do_softirq.part.19+0x40/0x50
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x51/0x60
ip6_finish_output2+0x23d/0x520
? ip6table_mangle_hook+0x55/0x160
__ip6_finish_output+0xa1/0x100
ip6_finish_output+0x30/0xd0
ip6_output+0x73/0x120
? __ip6_finish_output+0x100/0x100
ip6_xmit+0x2e3/0x600
? ipv6_anycast_cleanup+0x50/0x50
? inet6_csk_route_socket+0x136/0x1e0
? skb_free_head+0x1e/0x30
inet6_csk_xmit+0x95/0xf0
__tcp_transmit_skb+0x5b4/0xb20
__tcp_send_ack.part.60+0xa3/0x110
tcp_send_ack+0x1d/0x20
tcp_rcv_state_process+0xe64/0xe80
? tcp_v6_connect+0x5d1/0x5f0
tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x1b1/0x3f0
? tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x1b1/0x3f0
__release_sock+0x7f/0xd0
release_sock+0x30/0xa0
__inet_stream_connect+0x1c3/0x3b0
? prepare_to_wait+0xb0/0xb0
inet_stream_connect+0x3b/0x60
__sys_connect+0x101/0x120
? __sys_getsockopt+0x11b/0x140
__x64_sys_connect+0x1a/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x51/0x200
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The stack trace of mem_cgroup_sk_alloc() from IRQ-context:
Fixes: 2d7580738345 ("mm: memcontrol: consolidate cgroup socket tracking")
Fixes: d979a39d7242 ("cgroup: duplicate cgroup reference when cloning sockets")
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 4 ++++
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
@@ -6381,6 +6381,10 @@ void cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock_cgroup_
return;
}

+ /* Don't associate the sock with unrelated interrupted task's cgroup. */
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ return;
+
rcu_read_lock();

while (true) {
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6806,6 +6806,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(struct sock *sk
return;
}

+ /* Do not associate the sock with unrelated interrupted task's memcg. */
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ return;
+
rcu_read_lock();
memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup)