Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] powerpc/powernv: Parse device tree, population of SPR support

From: Pratik Sampat
Date: Tue Mar 17 2020 - 10:09:04 EST


Thank you Michael for the review.


On 17/03/20 8:43 am, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Parse the device tree for nodes self-save, self-restore and populate
support for the preferred SPRs based what was advertised by the device
tree.
These should be documented in:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/opal/power-mgt.txt

Sure thing I'll add them.

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
index 97aeb45e897b..27dfadf609e8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
@@ -1436,6 +1436,85 @@ static void __init pnv_probe_idle_states(void)
supported_cpuidle_states |= pnv_idle_states[i].flags;
}
+/*
+ * Extracts and populates the self save or restore capabilities
+ * passed from the device tree node
+ */
+static int extract_save_restore_state_dt(struct device_node *np, int type)
+{
+ int nr_sprns = 0, i, bitmask_index;
+ int rc = 0;
+ u64 *temp_u64;
+ u64 bit_pos;
+
+ nr_sprns = of_property_count_u64_elems(np, "sprn-bitmask");
+ if (nr_sprns <= 0)
+ return rc;
Using <= 0 means zero SPRs is treated by success as the caller, is that
intended? If so a comment would be appropriate.

My bad, this is undesirable. This should be treated as a failure.
I'll fix this.

+ temp_u64 = kcalloc(nr_sprns, sizeof(u64), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (of_property_read_u64_array(np, "sprn-bitmask",
+ temp_u64, nr_sprns)) {
+ pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: failed to find registers in DT\n");
+ kfree(temp_u64);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ /*
+ * Populate acknowledgment of support for the sprs in the global vector
+ * gotten by the registers supplied by the firmware.
+ * The registers are in a bitmask, bit index within
+ * that specifies the SPR
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_preferred_sprs; i++) {
+ bitmask_index = preferred_sprs[i].spr / 64;
+ bit_pos = preferred_sprs[i].spr % 64;
This is basically a hand coded bitmap, see eg. BIT_WORD(), BIT_MASK() etc.

I don't think there's an easy way to convert temp_u64 into a proper
bitmap, so it's probably not worth doing that. But at least use the macros.

Right. I'll use the macros for a cleaner abstraction.

+ if ((temp_u64[bitmask_index] & (1UL << bit_pos)) == 0) {
+ if (type == SELF_RESTORE_TYPE)
+ preferred_sprs[i].supported_mode &=
+ ~SELF_RESTORE_STRICT;
+ else
+ preferred_sprs[i].supported_mode &=
+ ~SELF_SAVE_STRICT;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (type == SELF_RESTORE_TYPE) {
+ preferred_sprs[i].supported_mode |=
+ SELF_RESTORE_STRICT;
+ } else {
+ preferred_sprs[i].supported_mode |=
+ SELF_SAVE_STRICT;
+ }
+ }
+
+ kfree(temp_u64);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int pnv_parse_deepstate_dt(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *sr_np, *ss_np;
You never use these concurrently AFAICS, so you could just have a single *np.

Sure, got rid of it.

+ int rc = 0, i;
+
+ /* Self restore register population */
+ sr_np = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,opal/power-mgt/self-restore");
I know the existing idle code uses of_find_node_by_path(), but that's
because it's old and crufty. Please don't add new searches by path. You
should be searching by compatible.

Alright, I'll replace of_find_node_by_path() calls with of_find_compatible_node()

+ if (!sr_np) {
+ pr_warn("opal: self restore Node not found");
This warning and the others below will fire on all existing firmware
versions, which is not OK.

I'll get rid of the warnings. They seem unnecessary to me also now.

+ } else {
+ rc = extract_save_restore_state_dt(sr_np, SELF_RESTORE_TYPE);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+ }
+ /* Self save register population */
+ ss_np = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,opal/power-mgt/self-save");
+ if (!ss_np) {
+ pr_warn("opal: self save Node not found");
+ pr_warn("Legacy firmware. Assuming default self-restore support");
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_preferred_sprs; i++)
+ preferred_sprs[i].supported_mode &= ~SELF_SAVE_STRICT;
+ } else {
+ rc = extract_save_restore_state_dt(ss_np, SELF_SAVE_TYPE);
+ }
+ return rc;
You're leaking references on all the device_nodes in here, you need
of_node_put() before exiting.

Got it. I'll clear the refcount before exitting.

+}

cheers
Thanks!
Pratik