Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] power: supply: Support ROHM bd99954 charger

From: andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Mar 25 2020 - 08:10:04 EST


On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:36:46AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-03-24 at 12:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:50:24AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:32:19AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > >
> > > I didn't find any evidence of use of those two, otherwise, missed
> > > property.h
> > > and perhaps mod_devicetable.h.

...

> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bd9995x_of_match);
> > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, bd9995x_acpi_match);
> >
> > I have to add since you are using those macros without ifdeffery, you
> > should
> > get warning in !ACPI and/or !OF cases.
> >
> > So, drop those of_match_ptr() / ACPI_PTR() and thus above headers.
>
> Sorry but I don't follow :/ I did drop whole ACPI table as the battery
> information is not fetched from ACPI anyways.

Okay, let's forget then about ACPI bits.

> But I don't know what you
> mean by dropping the of_match_ptr?

Literally do not use this macro. Otherwise you make a dependency to OF which
should be then in the Kconfig like

depend on OF || COMPILE_TEST

but in this case you will get compiler warning without ugly ifdeffery around
OF ID table (as you pointed below you didn't test that scenario).

> I for sure need the of_device_id as
> in many cases both the device matching and module matching are done
> based on of_match_table and of_device_id.
>
> I admit I didn't try compiling the !OF config. Are you suggesting I
> should put the of_device_id array and populating the of_match_table in
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF? Or maybe you suggest that I will put of_device_id
> array in #ifdef CONFIG_OF and use of_match_ptr() when populating the
> of_match_table pointer? I guess that would make sense. I'll do that -
> can you please explain if this was not what you meant.

One of us needs a morning covfefe, I think :-)

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko