Re: [Poke: Tejun] Re: [RFC v3 03/11] drm/vblank: Add vblank works

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:16:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Hey Tejun! So I ended up rewriting the drm_vblank_work stuff so that it used
> kthread_worker. Things seem to work alright now. But while we're doing just
> fine with vblank workers on nouveau, we're still having trouble meeting the
> time constraints needed for using vblank works for i915's needs. There still
> seems to be a considerable latency between when the irq handler for the vblank
> interrupts fires, and when the actual drm_vblank_work we scheduled starts:
...
> Tejun, do you have any idea if we might be able to further reduce the latency
> from the scheduler here? I believe we're already using pm_qos to at least
> reduce the latency between when the vblank interrupt fires and the interrupt
> handler starts, but that still isn't enough to fix the other latency issues
> apparently. We're also already setting the priority of kthread_worker->task to
> RT_FIFO as well.

I don't think the kernel can do much better than what you're seeing. I don't
know the time scale that you need - is it some tens of microseconds range? I'm
definitely not an expert on the subject but on generic kernels I don't think
you can achieve anything sub millisec with any kind of reliability.

If the timing is that tight and it's not a hot path, the right solution may be
polling for it rather than yielding the cpu and hoping to get scheduled in
time.

> Also, of course, let me know if you're not happy with the
> __kthread_queue_work() changes/kthread_worker usage in drm_vblank_work as well

Just glanced over it and I still wonder whether it needs to be that tightly
integrated, but we can look into that once we settle on whether this is the
right direction.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun