Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] dma-buf: cma_heap: Extend logic to export CMA regions tagged with "linux,cma-heap"

From: Brian Starkey
Date: Fri May 01 2020 - 06:22:02 EST


Hi John,

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:39:48AM +0000, John Stultz wrote:
> This patch reworks the cma_heap initialization so that
> we expose both the default CMA region and any CMA regions
> tagged with "linux,cma-heap" in the device-tree.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Liam Mark <lmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pratik Patel <pratikp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alistair Strachan <astrachan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> index 626cf7fd033a..dd154e2db101 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static int __add_cma_heap(struct cma *cma, void *data)
> {
> struct cma_heap *cma_heap;
> struct dma_heap_export_info exp_info;
> + struct cma *default_cma = dev_get_cma_area(NULL);
> +
> + /* We only add the default heap and explicitly tagged heaps */
> + if (cma != default_cma && !cma_dma_heap_enabled(cma))
> + return 0;

Thinking about the pl111 thread[1], I'm wondering if we should also
let drivers call this directly to expose their CMA pools, even if they
aren't tagged for dma-heaps in DT. But perhaps that's too close to
policy.

Cheers,
-Brian

[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2020-April/264358.html

>
> cma_heap = kzalloc(sizeof(*cma_heap), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!cma_heap)
> @@ -162,16 +167,11 @@ static int __add_cma_heap(struct cma *cma, void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int add_default_cma_heap(void)
> +static int cma_heaps_init(void)
> {
> - struct cma *default_cma = dev_get_cma_area(NULL);
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - if (default_cma)
> - ret = __add_cma_heap(default_cma, NULL);
> -
> - return ret;
> + cma_for_each_area(__add_cma_heap, NULL);
> + return 0;
> }
> -module_init(add_default_cma_heap);
> +module_init(cma_heaps_init);
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DMA-BUF CMA Heap");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.17.1
>