Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] firmware: stratix10-svc: Slightly simplify code

From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Sat May 02 2020 - 04:49:48 EST


Le 01/05/2020 Ã 18:55, Richard Gong a ÃcritÂ:
Hi,

On 5/1/20 10:48 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 01/05/2020 Ã 17:40, Richard Gong a ÃcritÂ:
Hi,

On 4/29/20 1:52 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Replace 'devm_kmalloc_array(... | __GFP_ZERO)' with the equivalent and
shorter 'devm_kcalloc(...)'.

It doesn't make much sense.
Actually devm_kcalloc returns devm_kmalloc_array(.., flag | __GFP_ZERO).

The only goal is to have a sightly less verbose code.
This saves one line of code and there is no need to wonder why we explicitly pass __GFP_ZERO to kmalloc_array.

Mostly a matter of taste.
I prefer this part remain unchanged.


The easiest would be just to ignore this patch entirely but if you need a v3 for the series, could you tell me if you have any comments on the 3 other patches?

CJ


Regards,
Richard


'devm_kcalloc' is inlined, so the binary should be exactly the same. >
CJ

'ctrl->genpool' can not be NULL, so axe a useless test in the remove
function.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
index 739004398877..c228337cb0a1 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
@@ -1002,8 +1002,7 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ÂÂÂÂÂ if (!controller)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return -ENOMEM;
 - chans = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, SVC_NUM_CHANNEL,
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ sizeof(*chans), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ÂÂÂ chans = devm_kcalloc(dev, SVC_NUM_CHANNEL, sizeof(*chans), GFP_KERNEL);
ÂÂÂÂÂ if (!chans)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ return -ENOMEM;
 @@ -1086,8 +1085,7 @@ static int stratix10_svc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ kthread_stop(ctrl->task);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ctrl->task = NULL;
ÂÂÂÂÂ }
-ÂÂÂ if (ctrl->genpool)
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ gen_pool_destroy(ctrl->genpool);
+ÂÂÂ gen_pool_destroy(ctrl->genpool);
ÂÂÂÂÂ list_del(&ctrl->node);
 Â return 0;


Regards,
Richard