Re: [patch V4 part 2 15/18] x86/kvm/svm: Handle hardirqs proper on guest enter/exit

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 06/05/20 10:48, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> So for instrumentation, especially interrupt disabled tracing we must
> track that change otherwise a latency analysis would claim that
> interrupts were disabled for the full time a task spent in user
> mode.

Oh okay, that's clear now.  I would just replace the four bullets in the
first comment with this sentence, and remove altogether the three
bullets in the second comment.

Thanks,

Paolo