Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree

From: Saeed Mahameed
Date: Sat May 09 2020 - 03:50:04 EST


On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 09:35 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:18:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> > ed7d4f023b1a ("bonding: Rename slave_arr to usable_slaves")
> > c071d91d2a89 ("bonding: Add helper function to get the xmit slave
> > based on hash")
> > 29d5bbccb3a1 ("bonding: Add helper function to get the xmit slave
> > in rr mode")
> >
> > from the rdma and mlx5-next trees and commit:
> >
> > ae46f184bc1f ("bonding: propagate transmit status")
> >
> > from the net-next tree.
>
> Saeed? These patches in the shared branch were supposed to be a PR to
> net-net? I see it hasn't happened yet and now we have conflicts??
>

Yes, I don't usually send standalone PRs of mlx5-next, and I only do it
with the corresponding (depending on) patches from net-next-mlx5, but I
agree this one was different I should have submitted it .. anyway the
conflict is minor, i already fixed it up and will submit soon..

Thanks,
Saeed.