Re: [PATCH net 2/2 RESEND] ipmr: Add lockdep expression to ipmr_for_each_table macro

From: Madhuparna Bhowmik
Date: Wed May 13 2020 - 01:35:12 EST


On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 09:32:31AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 10:47:05 +0530 Madhuparna Bhowmik wrote:
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_IP_MROUTE_MULTIPLE_TABLES
> > > > -#define ipmr_for_each_table(mrt, net) \
> > > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list, \
> > > > - lockdep_rtnl_is_held())
> > > > +#define ipmr_for_each_table(mrt, net) \
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list, \
> > > > + lockdep_rtnl_is_held() || \
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&pernet_ops_rwsem))
> > >
> > > This is a strange condition, IMHO. How can we be fine with either
> > > lock.. This is supposed to be the writer side lock, one can't have
> > > two writer side locks..
> > >
> > > I think what is happening is this:
> > >
> > > ipmr_net_init() -> ipmr_rules_init() -> ipmr_new_table()
> > >
> > > ipmr_new_table() returns an existing table if there is one, but
> > > obviously none can exist at init. So a better fix would be:
> > >
> > > #define ipmr_for_each_table(mrt, net) \
> > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list, \
> > > lockdep_rtnl_is_held() || \
> > > list_empty(&net->ipv4.mr_tables))
> > >
> > (adding Stephen)
> >
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > Thank you for your suggestion about this patch.
> > Here is a stack trace for ipmr.c:
> >
> > [...]
>
> Thanks!
>
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > Do you think a similar fix (the one you suggested) is also applicable
> > in the ip6mr case.
>
> Yes, looking at the code it seems ip6mr has the exact same flow for
> netns init.

Alright, thanks a lot.
I will send a patch for ip6mr.c soon.

Thank you,
Madhuparna